View Single Post
Old 08-18-2008, 12:24 PM   #21
MajorTom
 
MajorTom's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by poSSum View Post
I'm no engineer but for the life of me I don't understand how the rear can be better, lighter, cheaper, simpler (pick whichever ones are supposed to apply) than the double A-arms under the back of our Solstice.
I think the double a-arms are simpler. But this one is a larger platform that's shared across a few models. If you're arguing that this is a waste of time considering the Solstice is better, I dunno about that. But I think their reasoning is a slightly larger coupe that'll fit a small block under the hood with no problem. I know the Solstice and Skye have had V8s stuffed in them, but this chassis was designed for it.


Quote:
cus this is based off the vette suspension. vette>camaro>solstice
How do you figure that it's based off the Vette suspension? The Vette uses transverse leaf springs which are nothing like a Macpherson strut/multi-link setup. Zeta is new to GM and the only car available here right now that uses the same setup is the G8. I'm sure you knew that, but I don't see how you got the Vette connection.
MajorTom is offline   Reply With Quote