Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2009, 01:21 AM   #85
Traveler501
 
Drives: miata
Join Date: May 2009
Location: arizona
Posts: 1
hi, guys
not sure if you'll believe me, but I was the guy who designed this puppy for GM quite a few years ago. I googled it just to see if they are still using it...and bumped into this thread.
lots of truth, lots of well-intentioned nonsense in this thread. fwiw...the manifold is molded in 33% glass fiber filled nylon (which is technically a composite, but usually called a filled polymer). It is good for 350 def F continuous duty. The reason it is plastic is twofold...super cheap to make with a funky "lost metal" style used by Freudenberg in Germany (who makes them for GM) and because they add several hp from being so darn smooth inside, better than even "flowing" an aluminum head. also, obviously they are incredibly light and because of the advanced molding it was possible to incorporate other typically separate parts like the fuel rail and internal cooling runners, although I don't know if they are still doing that (hell I didn't even know they were still using it, although they predicted it would be in use for at least 30 years back in about 1992-3 when it was designed. As for the guy who said they don't flow as well...no way, that should be obvious on its face. If it didn't flow as well as metal, it's gotta be that somewhat dissimilar shapes were used, not the material...cause the difference is night and day. also, the manifold won't break down or explode with backfire, it will last beyond your lifetime without doubt...it was designed extra strong because of the imbalances in the early motors without counter-rotating shafts (I am assuming they must have counter-rotaters by now, but don't know). And even if it did get overstressed, it would simply swell microscopically, uniformly...strain, in other words. Also, GM didn't design it, Dupont did (who makes the material)...GM only designed the flow path of the tubes.
hope that wasn't too boring...pretty cool they are still using it IMO...oh, and no doubt they should be considered a performance mod...reverting to metal for performance reasons even for NO2 is backwards. The original design had a heavy throttle body hung on it...so this should handle any extra weight since I assume they must be individually fuel injected by now.
cheers
John
Traveler501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 01:51 AM   #86
Gentry78
HOOK'EM
 
Gentry78's Avatar
 
Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,279
dude have you ever heard of a Glock its made of plastic and if a fully automatic(if equipped) 45 can hold up and be one of the most reliable hand guns on the market, i think a manifold that just sit there under a hood will hold up just fine

this is a 9mm but you get the point
Gentry78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 09:50 AM   #87
UsedTaHaveA68
 
UsedTaHaveA68's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyundai Sonata
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 497
I feel a little bad for necrotizing this, but since plastic is so much cheaper than metal, anyone ever wonder why the FAST intakes are so damn expensive? I understand they don't sell as many, and they have to account for development costs but... $1000?? Really??
UsedTaHaveA68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 10:41 AM   #88
haulass350
 
haulass350's Avatar
 
Drives: 97 silverado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by UsedTaHaveA68 View Post
I feel a little bad for necrotizing this, but since plastic is so much cheaper than metal, anyone ever wonder why the FAST intakes are so damn expensive? I understand they don't sell as many, and they have to account for development costs but... $1000?? Really??
your paying for the technology not the plastic.
haulass350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 10:43 AM   #89
Robert91RS

 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Drives: Everywhere
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by haulass350 View Post
your paying for the technology not the plastic.
Yep, and the name.
Robert91RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 10:49 AM   #90
ss1129
Account Suspended
 
Drives: IOM 2010 2ss
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hannibal
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogue Leader View Post
Its almost as bad as the guys on the 4thgen sites that are determined to redneck their LS1 cars by removing the emissions, a/c, electronics, etc to "clean up the engine bay" and plan to keep the car forever (because they can do it better than GM... right). Then when the proverbial shit hits the fan and they have to sell their car (inevitable 75% of the time) they wonder why noone will touch their car with a 10 foot pole.
Or some people actually take all that shit out to make the car lighter and faster. Im no redneck or hillbilly, but my 98 SS was bare bones when I sold it. No power steering, abs, airbags, EGR, air injection (bullshit design that did nothing) It was mainly a drag car, but I drove it on the street often. So some people actually take that shit out besides cleaning up the engine bay.
ss1129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 11:19 AM   #91
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1129 View Post
Or some people actually take all that shit out to make the car lighter and faster. Im no redneck or hillbilly, but my 98 SS was bare bones when I sold it. No power steering, abs, airbags, EGR, air injection (bullshit design that did nothing) It was mainly a drag car, but I drove it on the street often. So some people actually take that shit out besides cleaning up the engine bay.
Did you weigh any of that stuff when you took it out? I'm always interested to find out how much individual parts weigh.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LS3 Specs revealed: GM's 436hp Sick 6.2L LS3 TAG UR IT Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 07-30-2009 06:02 PM
L99 AFM -- It's REALLY a tough choice, for some. Step Inside. 2KZ28_For_Now 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 128 04-03-2009 04:03 PM
5th Gen Camaro LS3 info from Chevy Hi-Po...READ TAG UR IT Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 295 03-07-2008 10:06 AM
LS3 Specs, and Descriptions Mr. Wyndham Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 5 11-06-2007 01:04 PM
AMT ERTL Plastic Model Camaro #ERT38467 Aliendude Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 6 05-16-2007 06:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.