Introducing the JacFab CAI system! Dyno numbers, and videos inside. - Page 4 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

IndeedSS1 · 08-13-2012, 11:24 AM

BLACK10 · 08-13-2012, 12:21 PM

Looking good

Mongoose03 · 08-13-2012, 05:02 PM

Can't wait to see the finished product...maybe even do a before and after dyno for ya

Ehmsea · 08-14-2012, 04:08 PM

Did you start the "name it" contest, yet?

Jason@JacFab · 08-14-2012, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ehmsea

Did you start the "name it" contest, yet?

We have not officially started yet, however some people have sent in a few names already. I want to make sure everything goes ok with the in house production prototype testing, and send out the first few for independent testing first. I will announce it on C5, and the JacFab Facebook page once the contest starts.

Higgs Boson · 08-14-2012, 04:36 PM

I think you should call it a Particle Collider.

klatterblast · 08-14-2012, 10:10 PM

Very nice looking CAI. Im gonna get my choice name in before someone else thinks of it
( CAT FIVE ) like category 5 hurricane.

Jason@JacFab · 08-23-2012, 12:01 PM

The mold is finally done, and I picked up the first piece from it yesterday (pictured below outside, and back side transition into tube)! The piece looks amazing! Nice and thick 3/16" wall thickness, light, nice texture, and has a heat deflection rating of 340° F @ 66 PSI, there should be NO issues with this under the hood.

I realize that I haven't divulged much data on the intake, so here is a flow comparison of the JacFab intake vs a generic tube and cone filter to give you something to ponder... Flow testing reported at 28" (typically the standard), as tested on our in house Super Flow flow bench.

A stock air box & filter only flows 793.4 CFM...

I was able to pull 1127.9 CFM though just a 4" tube similar to most after market intakes...

Adding a "high flow" cone filter to the end of the tube dropped the flow to 1076.7 CFM... (appx. 4.5% worse than the tube alone)

Adding the JacFab "Magic Stack" piece to the end of the tube inceased the flow to 1281.8 CFM with no filter. (appx 13.5% better than the tube alone)

With a "high flow" flat panel filter the complete JacFab intake flowed 1183.2 CFM... (appx 5% Better than the wide open tube with no filter attached, and appx 10% better than the tube with a cone filter. A WHOPPING 48% MORE FLOW than the factory airbox and filter!!!)

*Keep in mind this test was just for comparison of our intake vs a 4" intake tube, w/ and w/o filters. This test was not conducted through a head, intake, or throttle body.*

So rather than simply just sticking a cone filter on the end of a tube, we have in a sense maximized the allowable flow potential of the tube before even throwing a filter into the mix... The end result is a complete intake with the filter that flows more than a common 4" tube without a filter (which is awesome), and even more than a tube with a filter.

More stack pieces are being produced right now. I hope to have the first functioning production prototype on my car and doing more testing with it mid-late next week.

IndeedSS1 · 08-23-2012, 12:05 PM

Nice

Denis · 08-23-2012, 12:08 PM

looks awesome

Higgs Boson · 08-23-2012, 02:32 PM

Parabolica · 08-23-2012, 03:38 PM

Looks good.

I see you had a Vararam before. Did you measure its flow rate?

Higgs Boson · 08-23-2012, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parabolica

Looks good.

I see you had a Vararam before. Did you measure its flow rate?

he did. it was.....less.

Mongoose03 · 08-23-2012, 05:09 PM

You've caught my interest

08-13-2012, 11:24 AM	#43
IndeedSS1 Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Eastern MO Posts: 3,786	__________________ She is only memory now.

08-13-2012, 05:02 PM	#45
Mongoose03 Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: SW Ohio Posts: 73	Can't wait to see the finished product...maybe even do a before and after dyno for ya __________________ Frank 2011 2SS/RS L99 GMPP Exhaust

08-14-2012, 10:10 PM	#49
klatterblast Drives: 2010 camaro 2ssrs blk. Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: walker la. Posts: 1,732 View My Garage	Very nice looking CAI. Im gonna get my choice name in before someone else thinks of it ( CAT FIVE ) like category 5 hurricane. __________________ 2010 Hennessey HPE650 2SSRS Blk/Blk Magnuson TVS2300,ported heads,cam,Hotchkis suspension. Weld 17”s, Mickey Thompson’s.

08-23-2012, 12:01 PM	#50
Jason@JacFab Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Central Point, OR Posts: 5,688 View My Garage	The mold is finally done, and I picked up the first piece from it yesterday (pictured below outside, and back side transition into tube)! The piece looks amazing! Nice and thick 3/16" wall thickness, light, nice texture, and has a heat deflection rating of 340° F @ 66 PSI, there should be NO issues with this under the hood. I realize that I haven't divulged much data on the intake, so here is a flow comparison of the JacFab intake vs a generic tube and cone filter to give you something to ponder... Flow testing reported at 28" (typically the standard), as tested on our in house Super Flow flow bench. A stock air box & filter only flows 793.4 CFM... I was able to pull 1127.9 CFM though just a 4" tube similar to most after market intakes... Adding a "high flow" cone filter to the end of the tube dropped the flow to 1076.7 CFM... (appx. 4.5% worse than the tube alone) Adding the JacFab "Magic Stack" piece to the end of the tube inceased the flow to 1281.8 CFM with no filter. (appx 13.5% better than the tube alone) With a "high flow" flat panel filter the complete JacFab intake flowed 1183.2 CFM... (appx 5% Better than the wide open tube with no filter attached, and appx 10% better than the tube with a cone filter. A WHOPPING 48% MORE FLOW than the factory airbox and filter!!!) Keep in mind this test was just for comparison of our intake vs a 4" intake tube, w/ and w/o filters. This test was not conducted through a head, intake, or throttle body. So rather than simply just sticking a cone filter on the end of a tube, we have in a sense maximized the allowable flow potential of the tube before even throwing a filter into the mix... The end result is a complete intake with the filter that flows more than a common 4" tube without a filter (which is awesome), and even more than a tube with a filter. More stack pieces are being produced right now. I hope to have the first functioning production prototype on my car and doing more testing with it mid-late next week. Attached Images Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 09-10-2012 at 12:05 AM.

08-23-2012, 12:05 PM	#51
IndeedSS1 Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Eastern MO Posts: 3,786	Nice __________________ She is only memory now.

08-13-2012, 12:21 PM	#44
BLACK10 Drives: 2010 CAMARO. 10.04@133mph, 1.4 60' Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Lafayette, Louisiana Posts: 4,585	Looking good

08-14-2012, 04:08 PM	#46
Ehmsea Drives: 2013 2SS RS Hurst NPP Join Date: May 2012 Location: Perrysburg, OH Posts: 233 View My Garage	Did you start the "name it" contest, yet?

08-14-2012, 04:36 PM	#48
Higgs Boson Perpetual Order Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Texas Hill Country Posts: 1,277	I think you should call it a Particle Collider.

08-23-2012, 12:08 PM	#52
Denis Drives: 2010 SS Join Date: May 2012 Location: Yorktown Heights, NY Posts: 7,695 View My Garage	looks awesome __________________

08-23-2012, 02:32 PM	#53
Higgs Boson Perpetual Order Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Texas Hill Country Posts: 1,277

08-23-2012, 03:38 PM	#54
Parabolica Account Suspended Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: CA. Posts: 309	Looks good. I see you had a Vararam before. Did you measure its flow rate?

08-23-2012, 05:09 PM	#56
Mongoose03 Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: SW Ohio Posts: 73	You've caught my interest __________________ Frank 2011 2SS/RS L99 GMPP Exhaust