06-07-2011, 01:38 PM | #1 |
krabtree13
Drives: '10 S.W. 2SS/RS w/I.O. stripe pkg Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: plymouth,MA
Posts: 219
|
6.2 ltr. = how many cubic inches?
what does that translate to in cubic inches? is there a formula available?
|
06-07-2011, 01:40 PM | #2 |
OWTATIME
Drives: 1969 CaRaMo Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,082
|
376
__________________
|
06-07-2011, 01:41 PM | #3 |
I like teeth.
Drives: #198 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 4,817
|
1 liter = 61.0237441 cubic inches
6.2 liters = 378.3472 cubic inches |
06-07-2011, 01:43 PM | #4 |
I like teeth.
Drives: #198 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 4,817
|
|
06-07-2011, 01:44 PM | #5 | |
Drives: Me 2001 F150, The wife '11 2SS RS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 532
|
Quote:
Not an asshole just an asshole cheap shot huh |
|
06-07-2011, 01:46 PM | #6 |
Master of All Things
Drives: '20 Corvette Stingray Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Southeast of Houston, Texas
Posts: 22,345
|
google is your friend.......metric to standard converters
__________________
|
06-07-2011, 01:46 PM | #7 |
I like teeth.
Drives: #198 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 4,817
|
|
06-07-2011, 01:54 PM | #8 |
love. my. car.
|
Yeah our engines are actually 376ci, which is less than 6.2L
__________________
|
06-07-2011, 01:56 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: martinez Ga.
Posts: 503
|
nine answers to the same question,thats a little redundant
|
06-07-2011, 01:57 PM | #10 |
Troy
|
|
06-07-2011, 01:58 PM | #11 |
Drives: Car Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
|
Well -- Technically -- everyone is right for different reasons..
Literally interpreting the question, then yes, 6.2L = 378.347213 cubic inches But, I think the question is implying what is the displacement of our engine that is listed as a 6.2L -- The 6.2L isn't exactly 6.2L -- like many other engines, it's been rounded. It's 6,162 ml/cc. Use 4.06 x 3.62 for Bore and Stroke then multiply out by 8 cylinders to get the actual engine displacement. Disp = (πr˛h) * 8 Where r = 4.06/2 h = 3.62 |
06-07-2011, 02:01 PM | #12 |
|
When that L99 kicks down into 4cylinder operation, it's still more engine than those ricers!
|
06-07-2011, 02:01 PM | #13 |
Drives: Born:18 Sept 2009 #47903 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gloucester Virginia
Posts: 1,500
|
2010 2SS Coupe (V8)
The 2010 5th Generation SS trim level coupe with manual transmission is powered by the LS3 6.2 L (≈376 cu in) V8 engine producing 426 hp (318 kW) @ 5900 RPMs and 420 lb-ft (569 N m) @ 4600 RPMs while the SS with automatic transmission is power by a new L99 6.2 L V8 engine with Active Fuel Management producing 400 hp (300 kW) @ 5900 RPMs and 410 lb-ft (556 N m) @ 4300 RPMs.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS________________________________________Litho#140
|
06-07-2011, 02:02 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2010 SS , 1970 Z-28, 2002 Avalanche Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,524
|
Thanks for clearing that up!!!! GM put 376 in the owners manual for a reason.
__________________
IF IT'S WORTH HAVING, IT'S WORTH WAITING FOR!!!! (AND IT WAS)
434RWHP/403RWTQ Livernois Motorsports 2C Cam kit Kooks 1 7/8 LT Headers/Hi-Flo Cats/Corsa Exhaust Roto-Fab CAI / Port Intake Precission 2400/2800 Converter/3.73 AAM gears Livernois Motorsports Tune Best time: 11.97 @ 117 MPH |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SS has 376 or 378 cubic inches? | DCSS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 93 | 10-12-2012 10:50 AM |
Add some cubic inches to the LLT ? | Muscle Master | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 18 | 06-29-2010 08:34 AM |
Fun with cubic inches | Superman09 | Off-topic Discussions | 3 | 03-29-2010 09:10 PM |
There is No replacement for DISPLACEMENT !!! | Sir Nuke | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 22 | 02-18-2010 07:41 AM |
ls3 equal to or less than 410 cubic inches? | boostedyards86 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 18 | 12-10-2009 03:31 PM |