Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2014, 05:59 PM   #85
Azzkker
 
Azzkker's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 AGM ZL1, 99 z28, 89 iroc-z
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZO6 Bryan View Post
Does anyone have any actual data that performance is better with the replacement blower. Track times, dyno numbers, datalog?
Mine had a squealing front bearing that I think was the culprit of my performance gain. On the old unit I would get a slight delay from wot to boost building and it would not roast the tires from a roll in second due to this. The new one has instant response and builds boost much faster that it will light the tires up in second from roll and will break loose in the wot upshift to second and third which it never did before in third.
Mine must have been pretty bad.
Azzkker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 06:19 PM   #86
z28man2
 
z28man2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Coupe IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 193
For those of you who got there sc replaced what is the part number they are using? Also how do we know if the new unit is the revised sc?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL-1 #3553, IOM, Roto-Fab Intake, Vmax Ported TB, Apex Catch Can
z28man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 11:11 PM   #87
ZMEnow

 
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28man2 View Post
For those of you who got there sc replaced what is the part number they are using? Also how do we know if the new unit is the revised sc?
Because it will have a solid isolator in the snout.
ZMEnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 11:43 PM   #88
Samson2029
 
Drives: 328xi, ML400, ZL1 man. 2013
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quebec
Posts: 153
I agree about a likely performance gain. Seems to pull stronger and more easily. The old charger may have contributed to some drivetrain hp loss. My pulley had a lot of slack and the two spindles or rotors had many grooves.
Samson2029 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 10:46 AM   #89
HDRDTD


 
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28man2 View Post
For those of you who got there sc replaced what is the part number they are using? Also how do we know if the new unit is the revised sc?
The GM Part # listed on my repair invoice shows..
19303635 Superchar 3.342 N

Others have reported that this is the same part number as the original SC, so visually, there may not be a way to tell from the outside.

However once it's replaced, you'll be able to tell from the lack of rattle as well as slightly improved response.
HDRDTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 07:42 PM   #90
z28man2
 
z28man2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Coupe IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 193
That's strange mine was replaced last August and the part number on the side of the sc is 12622236. At the time I asked my dealer about that and they told me it was a differ part number than the original?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL-1 #3553, IOM, Roto-Fab Intake, Vmax Ported TB, Apex Catch Can
z28man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 08:01 PM   #91
ORLYHPD
C.O.T.W. 10-27-2014
 
ORLYHPD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 zl1
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 563
I just ordered a 2015 zl1 which arrives in about 2 weeks, does n e one know if the problem was fixed at the factory or is this something ill have to get done locally?
ORLYHPD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 08:25 PM   #92
blk 2013
 
blk 2013's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 6sp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Carrollton texas
Posts: 323
fixed early 2014
blk 2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 08:28 PM   #93
ORLYHPD
C.O.T.W. 10-27-2014
 
ORLYHPD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 zl1
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 563
thank you
ORLYHPD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 08:55 PM   #94
Chief Bob

 
Chief Bob's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro ZL1 SIM CTF Car M6
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 883
Just had the supercharger recall done on my 2012 CTF. I swear I can feel the difference on power and throttle response! BTW Rodgers Chevrolet is an awesome dealership!!
__________________
2012 ZL1,CTF Car, SIM MN6, Polished Wheels,The Rare Flat Black Insert.
Proud member of the unofficial Camaro5 "Rodgers Chevrolet Fan Club"


Chief Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 09:28 PM   #95
HDRDTD


 
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28man2 View Post
That's strange mine was replaced last August and the part number on the side of the sc is 12622236. At the time I asked my dealer about that and they told me it was a differ part number than the original?

All I know is what's listed on the repair invoice I have.
HDRDTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 10:25 PM   #96
ZMEnow

 
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28man2 View Post
That's strange mine was replaced last August and the part number on the side of the sc is 12622236. At the time I asked my dealer about that and they told me it was a differ part number than the original?
If it was replaced last August it's the same type they took off, which doesn't have a solid isolator. This is the main reason the TSB came out because they were replacing SC's that will just fail again.
ZMEnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:10 PM   #97
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZMEnow View Post
If it was replaced last August it's the same type they took off, which doesn't have a solid isolator. This is the main reason the TSB came out because they were replacing SC's that will just fail again.
Mine was replaced in Dec and it did have the solid isolator
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 12:04 AM   #98
ZL1-V

 
ZL1-V's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZMEnow View Post
If it was replaced last August it's the same type they took off, which doesn't have a solid isolator. This is the main reason the TSB came out because they were replacing SC's that will just fail again.

Is that a fact or an opinion? Please reference your source please? I had my unit replaced in April and it has the solid isolator. This supercharger is much quieter than the original unit.
ZL1-V is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.