07-08-2014, 05:59 PM | #85 | |
Drives: 2013 AGM ZL1, 99 z28, 89 iroc-z Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
Mine must have been pretty bad. |
|
07-08-2014, 06:19 PM | #86 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Coupe IOM Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 193
|
For those of you who got there sc replaced what is the part number they are using? Also how do we know if the new unit is the revised sc?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL-1 #3553, IOM, Roto-Fab Intake, Vmax Ported TB, Apex Catch Can
|
07-08-2014, 11:11 PM | #87 |
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
|
|
07-08-2014, 11:43 PM | #88 |
Drives: 328xi, ML400, ZL1 man. 2013 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quebec
Posts: 153
|
I agree about a likely performance gain. Seems to pull stronger and more easily. The old charger may have contributed to some drivetrain hp loss. My pulley had a lot of slack and the two spindles or rotors had many grooves.
|
07-09-2014, 10:46 AM | #89 | |
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
|
Quote:
19303635 Superchar 3.342 N Others have reported that this is the same part number as the original SC, so visually, there may not be a way to tell from the outside. However once it's replaced, you'll be able to tell from the lack of rattle as well as slightly improved response. |
|
07-09-2014, 07:42 PM | #90 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Coupe IOM Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 193
|
That's strange mine was replaced last August and the part number on the side of the sc is 12622236. At the time I asked my dealer about that and they told me it was a differ part number than the original?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL-1 #3553, IOM, Roto-Fab Intake, Vmax Ported TB, Apex Catch Can
|
07-09-2014, 08:01 PM | #91 |
C.O.T.W. 10-27-2014
|
I just ordered a 2015 zl1 which arrives in about 2 weeks, does n e one know if the problem was fixed at the factory or is this something ill have to get done locally?
|
07-09-2014, 08:25 PM | #92 |
Drives: 2017 SS 6sp Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Carrollton texas
Posts: 323
|
fixed early 2014
|
07-09-2014, 08:28 PM | #93 |
C.O.T.W. 10-27-2014
|
thank you
|
07-09-2014, 08:55 PM | #94 |
Drives: 2012 Camaro ZL1 SIM CTF Car M6 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 883
|
Just had the supercharger recall done on my 2012 CTF. I swear I can feel the difference on power and throttle response! BTW Rodgers Chevrolet is an awesome dealership!!
__________________
2012 ZL1,CTF Car, SIM MN6, Polished Wheels,The Rare Flat Black Insert. Proud member of the unofficial Camaro5 "Rodgers Chevrolet Fan Club" |
07-09-2014, 09:28 PM | #95 |
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
|
|
07-09-2014, 10:25 PM | #96 |
Drives: ZL1, 2013, tri-coat-red, manual Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,607
|
If it was replaced last August it's the same type they took off, which doesn't have a solid isolator. This is the main reason the TSB came out because they were replacing SC's that will just fail again.
|
07-09-2014, 11:10 PM | #97 |
CamaroFans.com
|
Mine was replaced in Dec and it did have the solid isolator
|
07-10-2014, 12:04 AM | #98 | |
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,155
|
Quote:
Is that a fact or an opinion? Please reference your source please? I had my unit replaced in April and it has the solid isolator. This supercharger is much quieter than the original unit. |
|
|
|
|
|